OUVER LIZIE TANG

MAKE THE BLIND SEE

For Mr. & Mrs. P.M who successfully put into practice the main tenet developed in this paper. Their adopted son has been saved.

INTRODUCTION

Primary schooling became free and accessible in 1954 and secondary schooling was made free for all in 1976. Yet less than 30% of our population can read, write and count. Over 70% are either semiliterate or downright non-literate and non-numerate.
Literacy does not mean being able to draw your name on a piece of paper or recognising the figures 0-9 to use a mobile phone. If you can write a few well-punctuated and grammatically-correct sentences about yourself, in the language of your choice, then you may be considered as one who has mastered basic literacy but to be functionally literate you must have “… the ability to identify, understand, interpret, create, communicate and compute, using printed and written materials associated with varying contexts.” ( https://gaml.uis.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/12/4.6.1_07_4.6-defining-literacy.pdf )
In the Republic of Mauritius, official figures on literacy cannot be trusted for there is a deliberate policy to hide the truth by defining literacy as ‘SCHOOLING’. Only about a quarter of our children manage to acquire basic literacy skills after 6 years of schooling. The official pass rate cannot be trusted for several reasons:
• The pass mark is in the neighbourhood of 30 marks after standardisation. Raw marks are lower and 20 marks may become 30-35 after standardisation.
• Multiple choice questions and one-word-answer questions carry 50 marks. It must be borne in mind that by just throwing the dart or by making a good guess, candidates may score up to 20 marks.
• A very great number of candidates are unable to tackle open-ended questions, sentence and essay writing.

ARE OUR CHILDREN “KATARS” (NITWITS)?

Certainly not! An absurd language policy is the main reason why our children find the school environment alien and hostile. Our narrow-minded, blind, timorous and self-seeking political leaders from all quarters have so far failed to understand the meaning of ‘mother tongue’ which should not be confused with ‘ancestral language’. They should read the works of Alfred Thomatis and Stanislas Dehaene to understand the importance of our mother tongue in the development of our brain. Worse still is the fact that they think that Mauritian (the most suitable name for Mauritian Creole, the first language, L1, of 90% of the population and the second language, L2, of the remaining 10%) is a corrupt form of French – broken French. They do neither know what a creole language is nor do they know that English is a creole language. Moreover, they confuse the term ‘medium of instruction’ with languages taught as subjects. The absence of the right initial medium of instruction is responsible for the disastrous situation our system of education is facing.
What a shame! In a recent past, it has been clearly shown that the right language policy can yield spectacular results. 200 young boys and girls who had flunked the then CPE twice, were given a special course based on mother tongue literacy and, 3 years later, over 150 of them passed the National Certificate of Education (NCE) and most of them today are skilled workers and literate citizens.

SPEECH, READING AND WRITING

As a result of evolution, the creature called ‘Homo sapiens’ is genetically programmed to use language orally and in their (his or her) brain there is an area responsible for this faculty, known as Broca’s area. But nowhere is there an area for the production and use of literacy which is realised when a person manages to build, in their (her or his) brain, a bridge between their Broca’s area and their visual fields. In other words, learning to speak a language comes naturally but learning to read and write your L1 is an arduous task requiring much effort and support from parents and teachers. Imagine the difficulty of our children who are asked to master literacy in 2 or 3 foreign languages (in English, French and an ancestral language) while their L1 is ignored. Add to this, the fact that in over 75% of cases, parental support is totally absent. Are our children failures? Or should we blame a system that is torturing our children and preventing them from developing their full potentials.

PA MWA SA, LI SA!

Let us not look for scapegoats! We all have our share of responsibility. Parents also are to blame. Being able to have children is, in most cases, quite natural and straight forward but looking after them is quite another business. Are adults aware of problems to be faced and are they prepared to learn or do they think that there is nothing to learn? Do they have the time or inclination to learn? Do they want real changes?
If all middle-class, lower middle-class, working-class and lower working-class parents were to take to the streets to demand the necessary changes, any government would capitulate. But since each group is thinking of its own petty interests, this will never happen.
The traditional parties share the same ideology and beliefs in this matter. We cannot expect any serious thinking from them.
The new breed of activists does not think that this issue deserves some attention. They all want spectacular and immediate popularity and success. Ce n’est pas demain la veille! IT’S NOT TOMORROW THE DAY BEFORE!
Worse, oh worse! Parents whose L1 is Mauritian, think that by using their own Frenchified gibberish, they will help their children to become ‘more intelligent’. Do these fools know that the ear is the first organ of the feotus to develop; that the child hears the mother talking, while still in the womb; that by not using the child’s L1 and language of the environment, they are hampering their normal development.
But there is hope. A couple, Mr. & Mrs. P.M, has opted for a more intelligent and suitable approach to help their ‘adopted’ son and the young boy who was thought to be a ‘katar’ (nitwit) is now recognised as ‘very bright’. He was ‘re-educated’ in his mother tongue (L1).
How many more children must we destroy before we come to realise the harm we are doing?

29.11.22

 

BEWARE OF SORCERER’S APPRENTICE

Quite recently, I listened to a discussion on ways and means to bring down the price of fuel. The participants (politicians, journalists, administrators, opinion leaders and a hunger striker) were unanimous about:
• the reduction of taxes on fuel;
• the need to abandon universal food and gas subsidy;
• the introduction of means test.
A means test is a determination of whether an individual or family is eligible for government assistance or welfare, based upon whether the individual or family possesses the means to do without that help.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Means_test).

The participants expressed their sympathy for the suffering ‘tidimoun’ and their scorn for the parasitic moneyed people and tourists who eat our bread made from subsidised flour. A means test for them (they call it ‘targeting’) is the magic formula to bring justice and raise the standard of living.
In concrete terms, what does it mean? A person or family with income X has the right to subsidised rice, flour, cooking gas etc. and if their income is X+1, they lose that right. This was proudly announced and applauded.
Let’s see what happens in practice. Say, a government run by our famous outspoken participants decides that a family of four with an income of Rs.25,000 or less will benefit from all subsidised products. If the income of that family goes up by one rupee (Rs.25,001), it will lose the right to subsidised goods.
The wise government run by the aforementioned do-gooders may introduce a graduated system:
1. Income under Rs.25,000 leads to full entitlement;
2. Income under Rs.50,000 leads to half subsidy;
3. Income under Rs,75,000 leads to one-third subsidy;
4. Income under Rs.100,000 leads to one quarter subsidy;
5. Income over Rs.100,000 leads to zero subsidy.

HOW DO YOU PUT THIS INTO PRACTICE?

First of all, each citizen must go about with a document which spells out his or her entitlement. Imagine the joy of your baker, shopkeeper or ‘dalpouri’ seller who has to calculate the price to be paid by each consumer depending on his or her entitlement.
How do you control that the right amount is paid to the authority which dispenses the subsidy? Do we have to put a police-officer in each shop or outlet? What guarantee do you have that a few corrupt police-officers will not use their prerogative to pocket thousands of illegal rupees?
Who will deliver the said documents? Civil servants, of course. Will not the door to corruption be wide open? The few black sheep in the civil service will see it as a godsend. Their power to ‘sell’ the right certificate to their appropriate clients will be enhanced.
How much will all this cost? Much more than the saving made to bring down the cost of fuel. But this is only part of the story. The means-test-walas, to be honest and credible, must go the whole hog and not focus on only food and cooking gas subsidy by proposing the following:
• Parents with means should not benefit from free-schooling for their offspring. Why should ‘WE’ waste our money on wealthy parents “who drive luxurious limos”? Teachers will simply have to wait for the complete collection of all school fees in order to receive their monthly salaries ‘as in the good old days’. Payment may be made on the 35th or even later.
• Only govt backbenchers and opposition MLAs who do not have any other source of income should be entitled to an allowance.
• Free universal medical care should be abolished. It should be free for only those whose income does not exceed a specified amount.
• Universal old age pension should be abolished. It should become a means-tested benefit.

SWEET EXCITING DEMAGOGY

A piecemeal approach to any problem is bound to give absurd results and open the door to demagogy of the type:
• Rich people buy sbsidised rice to feed their pets;
• Bakers use subsidised flour to make special expensive breads and thus make huge profits;
• Wealthy tourists eat our subsidised flour in the form of fancy breads and delicacies;
• Cooking gas is used for other purposes than cooking. It may be used to take a hot shower.
Just to make a case in favour of their demand for a price-reduction of fuel, the ‘means-test-walas’ are prepared to damage democracy, reduce freedom and increase the weight of bureaucracy. In short, they want to dismantle the welfare state.

(UPDATED VERSION)
28.11.22